Side by side
Gcore Virtual Machines vs OpenStack Barbican
Both stand on infrastructure as a service (iaas) software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APIWeb
Visit Gcore Virtual Machines Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted
Barbican offers OpenStack-native secret management with configurable storage integrations, including HSM support. Operators should account for its default key-storage tradeoff and the limits on container ACLs.
Visit OpenStack BarbicanThe facts
| Gcore Virtual Machines | OpenStack Barbican | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Web | API, Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 5 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | gcore.com | docs.openstack.org |
| On infrastructure as a service (iaas) software | #9 of 18 | #5 of 18 |
Gcore Virtual Machines: what it does well
OpenStack Barbican: what it does well
- REST API for provisioning and managing secrets
- Plugins can use software stores or HSMs
- Documented KMIP, Dogtag, Vault, and PKCS#11 options
- Custom plugins can handle storage, generation, and events
What to know first
- Default encryption key is plaintext in barbican.conf
- Container ACL settings do not extend to associated secrets
- Installation assumes a working OpenStack deployment
Alternatives to Gcore Virtual Machines Alternatives to OpenStack Barbican The whole list
