Side by side
Garble vs JavaScript Obfuscator
Both stand on code obfuscation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Linux
Garble provides several obfuscation options and build commands for Go projects, with deterministic output for matching inputs. Its exclusions and longer build time are worth considering, especially if debugging or runtime APIs matter.
Visit Garble Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1
JavaScript Obfuscator offers browser-based standard processing and paid VM and HTML options. Treat obfuscation as a readability barrier, not a place to store credentials or secrets.
Visit JavaScript ObfuscatorThe facts
| Garble | JavaScript Obfuscator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux | API, Extension, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Pro: $19 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On code obfuscation software | #8 of 34 | #4 of 34 |
Garble: what it does well
- Free plan with no trial required.
- Supports build, test, and run commands.
- Deterministic builds for the same inputs.
- Optional literal transformation and smaller binary mode.
What to know first
- Requires Go 1.27 or later.
- Go plugins are not supported.
- Exported methods are not obfuscated.
- Builds should take about twice as long as go build.
JavaScript Obfuscator: what it does well
- Unlimited standard obfuscation runs in the browser.
- Includes control-flow and string transformations.
- Lists integrations for common build tools.
- Supports Node.js and evergreen desktop browsers.
What to know first
- Obfuscation does not encrypt code.
- Obfuscated code may be 15% to 80% slower.
- TypeScript and JSX need compilation first.
- VM and HTML requests are processed on servers.
Alternatives to Garble Alternatives to JavaScript Obfuscator The whole list