FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

FQB Transfer vs lftp

Both stand on ftp and sftp clients. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

FQB Transfer

Free plan Mac

Choose FQB Transfer if you need a macOS client for several server protocols, concurrent transfers, synchronization, or remote editing. Consider another option if you need a platform other than macOS or need clear pricing details for paid access before choosing a plan.

Visit FQB Transfer

lftp

Free plan Linux

lftp covers a wide range of transfer protocols and automation tasks from the Linux command line. Readers should note the differing version labels and the stated limit on author support.

Visit lftp

The facts

FQB Transferlftp
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onMacLinux
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published31
MakerFQB TransferNot published
Websitefqbtransfer.comlftp.yar.ru
On ftp and sftp clients#12 of 36#8 of 36

FQB Transfer: what it does well

  • Supports FTP, FTPS, SFTP, SCP, Amazon S3, and WebDAV.
  • Queues show transfer progress in real time.
  • Supports concurrent transfers and file and folder synchronization.
  • Saved sessions can be exported and imported on another Mac.
  • Supports Apple Silicon and includes a built-in terminal.

What to know first

  • Built specifically for macOS.
  • The free plan is described only as a free download.

lftp: what it does well

  • Supports FTP, HTTP, SFTP, HTTPS, FTPS and BitTorrent.
  • Can resume downloads and retry after non-fatal errors.
  • Mirror and reverse-mirror directory trees.
  • Supports parallel transfers, queues and timed jobs.

What to know first

  • Available platform listed is Linux.
  • Author reports limited time for support.
  • Homepage and download page list different release versions.

Alternatives to FQB Transfer Alternatives to lftp The whole list