FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

fnm vs GHCup

Both stand on runtime version managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

fnm

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

fnm offers project-specific Node.js version management and shell integrations across major desktop platforms. Its installation script has extra prerequisites on macOS and Linux, and the project has not set up a SECURITY.md file.

Visit fnm

GHCup

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2

GHCup brings installation and version management for several core Haskell tools into one utility. Users should check its stated platform limits and experimental binary support before choosing an environment.

Visit GHCup

The facts

fnmGHCup
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comhaskell.org
On runtime version managers#6 of 30#2 of 30

fnm: what it does well

  • Free, with no paid plans listed
  • Supports macOS, Windows, and Linux
  • Works with `.node-version` and `.nvmrc`
  • Can switch versions when changing directories
  • Shell setup instructions cover six environments

What to know first

  • macOS and Linux install script requires curl and unzip
  • Project has no SECURITY.md file

GHCup: what it does well

  • Manages GHC, cabal-install, HLS, and Stack versions.
  • Stack can use GHC versions managed by GHCup.
  • Includes a terminal user interface.
  • Supports GHC cross-compilation.
  • Free and open source.

What to know first

  • Windows support is described as early stage.
  • WSL1 is unsupported.
  • macOS versions earlier than 10.13 are unsupported.
  • Some ARM binaries are experimental.

Alternatives to fnm Alternatives to GHCup The whole list