Side by side
Flowblade vs VirtualDub
Both stand on video editing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Linux
Flowblade provides a broad editing and compositing toolkit in a free Linux desktop application. Its codec dependence and lack of Windows or OS X support matter when choosing a platform-specific editor.
Visit Flowblade Free plan Windows
VirtualDub remains a focused, free utility for capture and linear video processing on Windows. Its AVI emphasis, driver requirements and companion-to-editor design define where it fits.
Visit VirtualDubThe facts
| Flowblade | VirtualDub | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux | Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | jliljebl.github.io | virtualdub.org |
| On video editing software | #104 of 153 | #108 of 153 |
Flowblade: what it does well
- Free GPL3-licensed software
- Multitrack, non-linear timeline
- Proxy and original media switching
- Batch render queue
- G'MIC image processing tool
What to know first
- Linux only; Windows and OS X unsupported
- Media support depends on installed codecs
- Repository versions may be outdated
- Development builds may be unstable
VirtualDub: what it does well
- Free under the GNU General Public License
- AVI2 and multisegment capture support
- Batch processing for many files
- Video filters and frame-rate adjustment
- Third-party DLL extensibility
What to know first
- Windows only
- Capture requires a compatible Video for Windows driver
- Primarily geared toward AVI files
- Reads but does not write MPEG-1
Alternatives to Flowblade Alternatives to VirtualDub The whole list