Side by side
FileRun vs FM/2
Both stand on file manager software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial AndroidAPIiPhone+5
FileRun combines self-hosted storage with sharing, synchronization, search, editing integrations, and extensive authentication choices. It is feature-rich for organizations managing their own infrastructure, but requires server administration and paid plans.
Visit FileRun Free plan Self-hosted
FM/2 provides a free OS/2 file-management workspace with archive handling and accessible project resources. Its Netdrive behavior and OS/2-only support are important considerations.
Visit FM/2The facts
| FileRun | FM/2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Small business: €9.90 per user a year | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | FileRun | Not published |
| Website | filerun.com | trac.netlabs.org |
| On file manager software | #67 of 100 | #71 of 100 |
FileRun: what it does well
- Files stay on the customer’s server
- Seven sharing roles and guest access
- Desktop sync across three operating systems
- Mobile apps, WebDAV, and REST API
- OCR and document-content search
What to know first
- No free plan
- Requires PHP and MySQL
- Version history is limited
- Self-hosted deployment required
FM/2: what it does well
- Free GNU GPL software
- Supports OS/2
- Includes archive support
- Source browsing and checkout instructions
- User and developer mailing lists
What to know first
- OS/2 is the listed platform
- Netdrive scans may be slow
- Capacity figures may become inaccurate
- Issue tickets require a Netlabs account