Side by side
Fetcher vs ScreenWith.me
Both stand on ai recruiting software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid ExtensionWeb
Fetcher combines candidate discovery, inbound review, outreach, and ATS connections for recruiting teams.
Visit Fetcher Paid Web
ScreenWith.me brings resume scoring, asynchronous interviews, assessments, and candidate tracking into a web-based hiring workflow. Its custom pricing and lack of a named direct ATS integration are worth considering.
Visit ScreenWith.meThe facts
| Fetcher | ScreenWith.me | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Self-serve (annual): $99 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 5 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | fetcher.ai | screenwith.me |
| On ai recruiting software | #20 of 27 | #24 of 27 |
Fetcher: what it does well
- AI-assisted candidate search
- Ranks inbound candidates against job requirements
- Includes candidate outreach and bulk export
- Two-way ATS syncing with Ashby, Greenhouse, and Lever
- Offers EU data residency
What to know first
- No free plan
- Self-serve costs $115 a month
ScreenWith.me: what it does well
- Scores resumes against job descriptions on a 100-point scale.
- Candidates answer timed questions in a browser without accounts.
- Provides interview transcription, scoring, feedback, and summaries.
- Optional technical assessments support two question formats.
- Hiring teams can move candidates between pipeline stages.
What to know first
- Pricing is custom and volume-based.
- No direct ATS integration is named.
- A person must make the final hiring decision.
Alternatives to Fetcher Alternatives to ScreenWith.me The whole list