Side by side
Fatpack vs TinyLoad
Both stand on executable packers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Windows
Fatpack covers a defined set of Windows PE targets, with TLS support and several executable-processing capabilities. Note the .NET exclusion, the experimental status of section packing, and the reported Defender interference issue.
Visit Fatpack Free plan Windows
TinyLoad is a specialized packer for Windows x64 PE files, with optional compression, VM encryption and VEH features. Be aware that the maker reports nine VirusTotal detections, including for files packed with it.
Visit TinyLoadThe facts
| Fatpack | TinyLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Windows | Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | iamsopotatoe-coder.github.io |
| On executable packers | #9 of 28 | #13 of 28 |
Fatpack: what it does well
- LZMA compression for native x64 executables
- Supports TLS callbacks and TLS data
- Does not require C/C++ redistributables
- Available under the MIT License
What to know first
- .NET executables are unsupported
- Section packing is experimental
- Windows Defender interference may cause packing failures
TinyLoad: what it does well
- Free and MIT-licensed.
- Supports optional LZ77 compression.
- Offers VM encryption and optional VEH handling.
- Precompiled binaries and source code are available.
- Runs packed payloads in memory without writing the original to disk.
What to know first
- Supports only 64-bit PE files.
- At least one protection option is required.
- The maker reports nine VirusTotal detections.
Alternatives to Fatpack Alternatives to TinyLoad The whole list