Side by side
Fathom vs ghostmeet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan WebWindowsMac
Visit Fathom Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1
ghostmeet combines local browser audio transcription with optional Claude-based meeting summaries. Its self-hosted, account-free design gives users control, while summary generation depends on an external API.
Visit ghostmeetThe facts
| Fathom | ghostmeet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web, Windows, Mac | API, Extension, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Team: $15 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 5 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | fathom.ai | ghostmeet.sshlab.dev |
| On ai meeting assistants | #12 of 82 | #41 of 82 |
Fathom: what it does well
ghostmeet: what it does well
- Whisper transcription works offline
- Captures audio from several browser meeting platforms
- Summaries include decisions and action items
- Transcripts persist through backend restarts
- Open source under the MIT license
What to know first
- Native Zoom and Teams desktop apps are unsupported
- Summaries require an Anthropic API key
- Summarization needs an internet connection
- Speaker diarization is still a roadmap feature
Alternatives to Fathom Alternatives to ghostmeet The whole list

