FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Facet vs imagic

Both stand on ai photo culling software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Facet

Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+3

Facet combines local photo scoring, culling, face organization, and a shareable web gallery. It does not edit or develop RAW files, and the maker says it has no mobile app or cloud backup.

Visit Facet

imagic

Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1

Choose imagic if you want local desktop culling and RAW editing, with one-time license options and AI scoring. Look elsewhere if you need a license active on multiple machines at once or do not want web edits sent to a server.

Visit imagic

The facts

Facetimagic
Free planYesYes
Open sourceYesNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsLinux, Mac, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestimagic Lite: €19, paid once
Plans published23
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitencoevoet.github.ioimagic.ink
On ai photo culling software#1 of 29#3 of 29

Facet: what it does well

  • Free plan with no cloud, accounts, or API keys
  • Scores photos across nine dimensions
  • Detects bursts, blinks, similar photos, and duplicates
  • Supports XMP metadata with four named photo tools
  • Core features run on CPU

What to know first

  • No RAW editing or development
  • No mobile app or cloud backup
  • Setup requires Python
  • NVIDIA GPU is needed for additional models and features

imagic: what it does well

  • AI scores sharpness, exposure, noise, composition and detail.
  • Detects duplicates, blur and closed eyes.
  • Supports a broad range of RAW and image formats.
  • Desktop processing runs locally; edits are non-destructive.
  • Lite, Plus and Max are one-time purchases.

What to know first

  • A license activates on one machine at a time.
  • The web editor sends uploaded images to imagic’s server.
  • The trial caps exports at 500 photos.

Alternatives to Facet Alternatives to imagic The whole list