Side by side
EShot vs ScreenClip
Both stand on screenshot annotation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxWindows
EShot combines capture, markup, OCR, visual search, uploads, and recording in a free native tool. Check Linux desktop support and privacy implications before sending screenshots for visual search.
Visit EShot Free plan Extension
ScreenClip combines browser capture, annotation, redaction, sharing, and collaborative editing. The free Basic tier has clear storage and file-size limits, while Plus expands capacity and adds Google Drive storage without a listed price.
Visit ScreenClipThe facts
| EShot | ScreenClip | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Windows | Extension |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | screenclip.com |
| On screenshot annotation software | #40 of 76 | #44 of 76 |
EShot: what it does well
- Region and monitor capture
- Extensive annotation overlay
- Tesseract OCR included
- GIF and MP4 recording
- Free and MIT-licensed
What to know first
- Visual search uploads regions publicly
- Other Linux desktops are unsupported
- No team collaboration
- No browser extension
ScreenClip: what it does well
- Captures selected or full scrolling pages
- Annotations include blur and comments
- Source links remain with screenshots
- Private clips by default
- Google Drive storage integration
What to know first
- Basic limits users to 100 clips
- Basic uploads are limited to 1MB
- Plus uploads are limited to 8MB
Alternatives to EShot Alternatives to ScreenClip The whole list