Side by side
esbuild vs Oxc
Both stand on javascript build tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidAPILinux+4
esbuild combines bundling and optimization features in free MIT-licensed software. Its lack of TypeScript type checking and limited code splitting are important considerations for project setup.
Visit esbuild Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Oxc brings multiple JavaScript development tools into one free collection, with broad lint rules and formatter support. The experimental runner has explicit limitations, so it should not be treated as a type checker.
Visit OxcThe facts
| esbuild | Oxc | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | esbuild.github.io | oxc.rs |
| On javascript build tools | #1 of 27 | #4 of 27 |
esbuild: what it does well
- Built-in support for JavaScript, CSS, TypeScript, and JSX
- Bundles ESM, CommonJS, and CSS modules
- Includes tree shaking, minification, and source maps
- Interfaces available through CLI, JavaScript, and Go
- MIT-licensed software
What to know first
- Does not type-check TypeScript
- Code-splitting support is described as primitive
- Active feature development is not currently underway
- Primarily built by one developer
Oxc: what it does well
- Toolchain includes a linter, formatter and minifier
- Oxlint includes more than 870 rules
- Oxfmt can sort imports and package fields
- Runs on Linux, macOS and Windows
What to know first
- Experimental runner does not type-check programs
- Runner APIs and behavior may change between releases
- Oxlint's speed comparison is stated as a project claim