Side by side
EPPI-Reviewer vs LitFlow
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
EPPI-Reviewer combines review management, analysis, and screening tools with Zotero and OpenAlex connections. Check the shared-review fees and access limits, especially if several people need to collaborate.
Visit EPPI-Reviewer Free plan Self-hostedWeb
LitFlow offers a documented review workflow with AI suggestions while leaving decisions to researchers. Access is limited to an approved closed-alpha cohort, and the listed free plan is for academic use.
Visit LitFlowThe facts
| EPPI-Reviewer | LitFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | See the plans | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | eppi.ioe.ac.uk | litflow.org |
| On ai literature review software | #11 of 38 | #15 of 38 |
EPPI-Reviewer: what it does well
- Supports qualitative and quantitative analysis.
- Includes deduplication and priority screening tools.
- Connects reviews to a Zotero Group Library.
- One-month trial includes unlimited non-shareable reviews.
- Cochrane authors and Campbell reviews have eligible free access.
What to know first
- Shared reviews require active user accounts for all members.
- Expired access becomes read-only.
- Data recovery after accidental changes is fee-based.
- Direct project support and training may incur charges.
LitFlow: what it does well
- AI screening links suggestions to source passages.
- Researchers retain screening decisions.
- Logs AI suggestions and human decisions.
- Academic use is free.
What to know first
- Closed alpha requires maintainer approval.
- No commercial tier is listed.
- OSF and Zenodo integration remain under consideration.
Alternatives to EPPI-Reviewer Alternatives to LitFlow The whole list