FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Envoy Gateway vs Kusk Gateway

Both stand on kubernetes ingress controllers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Envoy Gateway

Free plan APISelf-hosted

Envoy Gateway combines gateway configuration, traffic controls, and security features around Envoy Proxy. Check the release caveat and Kubernetes prerequisite when planning an installation.

Visit Envoy Gateway

Kusk Gateway

Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+3

Kusk Gateway combines OpenAPI-driven Kubernetes configuration with validation, request controls, and an open-source dashboard. Its self-hosted model and Kubernetes focus are central considerations.

Visit Kusk Gateway

The facts

Envoy GatewayKusk Gateway
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedYes
Runs onAPI, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published12
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegateway.envoyproxy.iokusk.io
On kubernetes ingress controllers#8 of 28#4 of 28

Envoy Gateway: what it does well

  • Supports standalone and Kubernetes deployments.
  • Offers rate limiting, retries, circuit breaking, and failover.
  • Includes mTLS, OIDC, JWT, and API-key controls.
  • Lists metrics, access logging, and distributed tracing.

What to know first

  • Quickstart requires a Kubernetes cluster.
  • Latest release might not be stable.

Kusk Gateway: what it does well

  • Uses OpenAPI definitions to configure Kubernetes Ingress.
  • Can mock API responses for prototyping.
  • Automatically validates requests and responses.
  • Offers path-level headers, limits, and QoS controls.
  • Free and licensed under MIT.

What to know first

  • Deployment model is self-hosted.
  • Focused on Kubernetes API gateway workflows.
  • No pricing tiers beyond the free gateway are listed.

Alternatives to Envoy Gateway Alternatives to Kusk Gateway The whole list