Side by side
Endlessh vs Honeytrap
Both stand on honeypot software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Endlessh provides a focused SSH tarpit with configurable logging and network binding options. Its default client limit and queued excess connections are worth considering when planning deployment.
Visit Endlessh Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Honeytrap provides flexible honeypot deployment and logging options, including centralized management for multiple agents. The lack of listed releases is worth noting before choosing it.
Visit HoneytrapThe facts
| Endlessh | Honeytrap | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On honeypot software | #5 of 21 | #9 of 21 |
Endlessh: what it does well
- Free and identified as open source.
- Supports IPv4 and IPv6.
- Allows up to 4096 clients by default.
- Can send logs to syslog.
- Configuration can be reloaded with SIGHUP.
What to know first
- Linux and self-hosted platforms are listed.
- Excess connections wait in the queue.
- Maximum banner line length defaults to 32 characters.
Honeytrap: what it does well
- Combines multiple services in one honeypot.
- Centralizes configuration and logging across agents.
- Routes multiple protocols through one port.
- Supports low- through high-interaction honeypots.
- Offers several logging destinations and filters.
What to know first
- Linux and self-hosted deployment only.
- GitHub currently lists no repository releases.
Alternatives to Endlessh Alternatives to Honeytrap The whole list