Side by side
EasyNMT vs Redokun
Both stand on translation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted
EasyNMT offers a flexible, open-source route to neural translation with local, API, and Docker deployment options. Its model input limits and experimental positioning matter for production planning.
Visit EasyNMT Free trial Web
Redokun combines file-aware translation with terminology and revision controls. Its plans range from a Project Pass to larger monthly or annual workspaces, so word and seat allowances matter.
Visit RedokunThe facts
| EasyNMT | Redokun | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Core: $3,828 a year |
| Plans published | None | 10 |
| Maker | Not published | Redokun |
| Website | github.com | redokun.com |
| On translation software | #129 of 156 | #125 of 156 |
EasyNMT: what it does well
- Translates sentences, documents, and batches
- Supports more than 100 languages
- Automatic language detection with fastText
- Docker REST endpoints available
- Multi-GPU and multi-process support
What to know first
- Input lengths are limited by model
- Longer documents are split into sentences
- 12-billion-parameter M2M model is unsupported
- Project is described as experimental
Redokun: what it does well
- Preserves original document design and layout
- Supports common office and translation formats
- Provides translation memory and glossary tools
- Identifies changed content for revisions
- Offers a 14-day trial
What to know first
- No free plan is available
- Project Pass access lasts 30 days
- AI drafts need recommended human review
- Email support has listed weekday hours
Alternatives to EasyNMT Alternatives to Redokun The whole list