FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

DRAKVUF vs Procyon

Both stand on reverse engineering tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

DRAKVUF

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

DRAKVUF offers agentless monitoring for malware analysis and other binary tracing, with Windows plugins for several forms of activity. Its Intel hardware and host setup requirements are important to check first.

Visit DRAKVUF

Procyon

Free plan Linux

Procyon combines Java reflection, code-generation tools, expression trees, and decompilation in a free suite. Note the experimental status and the stated limitations with some non-javac compiled classes.

Visit Procyon

The facts

DRAKVUFProcyon
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedLinux
Lowest paid planNot publishedFree or on request
Plans publishedNone1
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitedrakvuf.comgithub.com
On reverse engineering tools#36 of 73#40 of 73

DRAKVUF: what it does well

  • Open source and free
  • Monitors Windows and Linux without a guest agent
  • Can extract files from memory before deletion
  • Pre-built Debian packages are available

What to know first

  • Requires Intel VT-x and Extended Page Tables
  • Does not work on AMD CPUs
  • Self-hosted Linux setup required
  • Installation guide requires a dom0 kernel version 5.11 or later

Procyon: what it does well

  • Free suite of Java metaprogramming tools.
  • Reflection supports generics and wildcards.
  • Decompiler supports Java 5 and later features.
  • Public API allows integration into other applications.
  • Libraries are available from Maven Central.

What to know first

  • Java 7 is required to run the decompiler.
  • Compiler toolset and decompiler are marked experimental.
  • Non-javac compiled classes may decompile less optimally.

Alternatives to DRAKVUF Alternatives to Procyon The whole list