FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

dnSpyEx vs pyOCD

Both stand on debuggers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

dnSpyEx

Free plan LinuxWindows

dnSpyEx combines debugging, decompilation, editing, and assembly analysis at no cost. Its dynamic-method limitation and Wine-based Linux use are important constraints.

Visit dnSpyEx

pyOCD

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

pyOCD combines GDB debugging, flash programming, and Python-based device control for Arm Cortex targets. Check the memory-map and device-security limitations for your setup before relying on those features.

Visit pyOCD

The facts

dnSpyExpyOCD
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, WindowsAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.compyocd.io
On debuggers#6 of 27#10 of 27

dnSpyEx: what it does well

  • Debugs .NET Framework, .NET, and Unity assemblies
  • Edits C#, Visual Basic, and low-level IL
  • Includes decompilers, disassembly, and assembly analysis
  • Free and GPLv3-licensed

What to know first

  • Dynamic methods cannot be debugged
  • Linux use is through Wine, not native support
  • Unity game debugging also requires the Unity Mono repository

pyOCD: what it does well

  • GDB server supports command-line and IDE debugging.
  • Programs internal or external flash and loads RAM images.
  • Built-in support for more than 70 Cortex-M devices.
  • Python API can support CI and custom debug tools.

What to know first

  • Requires Python 3.9 or later.
  • Remote probe connections are disabled by default.
  • Unlocking a locked device can erase all chip data.
  • CMSIS-Pack support uses one system memory map for all CPUs.

Alternatives to dnSpyEx Alternatives to pyOCD The whole list