Side by side
DepGuard vs OHRisk
Both stand on open source package health tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan
Visit DepGuard Free plan LinuxMacWindows
OHRisk offers multiple report formats and CI workflows for license-risk review, including visible waivers. Its documented coverage gaps and legal-review caveat matter when interpreting its findings.
Visit OHRiskThe facts
| DepGuard | OHRisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On open source package health tools | #7 of 14 | #3 of 14 |
DepGuard: what it does well
OHRisk: what it does well
- Supports many dependency ecosystems and SBOM formats
- Generates SARIF and CycloneDX reports
- GitHub Actions support includes scan, ci, and diff
- Waived findings remain visible in reports
What to know first
- Requires Node.js 24.0.0 or later
- Some dependency sources and graph types are not scanned
- Does not replace legal review
Alternatives to DepGuard Alternatives to OHRisk The whole list