Side by side
Darcs vs GitUI
Both stand on version control software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
Darcs centers collaboration on patches, with offline work, interactive selection, and email-based proposals. Its lack of local branches and file-permission versioning, along with reported performance problems, may matter for some workflows.
Visit Darcs Free plan Open source AndroidLinuxMac+2
GitUI covers many common change, stash, branch, and history workflows inside a terminal. Its beta status and the need to configure HTTPS credentials explicitly are important limitations to weigh.
Visit GitUIThe facts
| Darcs | GitUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | Android, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | darcs.net | github.com |
| On version control software | #7 of 62 | #3 of 62 |
Darcs: what it does well
- Repositories support recording changes offline.
- Interactive commands let users select changes for patches.
- Email proposals do not require contributors to have commit privileges.
- Available for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- Free and open source.
What to know first
- Does not support local branches.
- Does not use a Git-style staging index.
- Does not version file permissions.
- FAQ notes performance problems in many areas.
GitUI: what it does well
- Changes can be managed at file, hunk, or line level.
- Stashes can be saved, applied, and inspected.
- Supports branch management and remote operations.
- Commit history can be browsed or searched.
- Free under the MIT License.
What to know first
- README describes the project as beta.
- Does not fully replace the Git shell.
- No sparse repository support.
- HTTPS credential helper needs explicit configuration.