Side by side
Danger JS vs Robin Review
Both stand on pull request automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit Danger JS 
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Robin Review combines GitHub pull request feedback with configurable LLM endpoints and has no review quota on its free plan. Account for the provider token costs and the listed default limits on diff size and inline comments.
Visit Robin ReviewThe facts
| Danger JS | Robin Review | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | danger.systems | robinreview.dev |
| On pull request automation tools | #19 of 29 | #15 of 29 |
Danger JS: what it does well
Robin Review: what it does well
- Posts summaries and severity-organized inline comments.
- Supports multiple OpenAI-compatible endpoints.
- No seat count or review quota.
- MIT-licensed source code is published on GitHub.
- Installer adds a skill for coding agents.
What to know first
- Requires your own LLM API key.
- Users pay their LLM provider for tokens.
- Default maximum diff size is 50,000 characters.
- Default maximum is 15 inline comments.
Alternatives to Danger JS Alternatives to Robin Review The whole list