Side by side

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs GaraTrust

Both stand on code signing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted

Paid APILinuxMac+3

Code Sign Manager combines key-use controls, approvals, and auditing with client options for several operating systems. Buyers should account for its Trust Protection Foundation installation requirements and request pricing from CyberArk.

Visit CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted

GaraTrust

Paid Self-hosted

GaraTrust combines broad artifact support with HSM-backed keys and controlled signing workflows.

Visit GaraTrust

The facts

	CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted	GaraTrust
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows	Self-hosted
Lowest paid plan	Not published	Free or on request
Plans published	None	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	docs.venafi.com	garantir.io
On code signing software	#19 of 28	#23 of 28

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted: what it does well

Keys can be protected in a secret store or HSM
Administrators can restrict use by purpose, user, and IP
Signing requests can require approval
APIs expose event logs and signing statistics
Client interfaces cover Windows, Linux, and macOS

What to know first

Pricing is available only on request
Deployment requires multiple Trust Protection Foundation components
Cloud signing is not supported

GaraTrust: what it does well

Supports signing across numerous software formats and targets.
Signing keys stay in non-exportable HSMs.
Supports CI/CD and developer workstation signing.
Includes 24/7/365 production support.

What to know first

Pricing is available on request.
Signing key storage depends on HSMs.
The signing client sends a hash, not the binary, for signing.

Alternatives to CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted Alternatives to GaraTrust The whole list