FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Current vs Nah.pet

Both stand on url shorteners. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Current

Paid APISelf-hostedWeb

Current combines branded short links, analytics, QR codes, and team controls in a self-hosted platform. Check the license restrictions and gated SSO before adopting it for commercial use.

Visit Current

Nah.pet

Paid APISelf-hostedWeb

Nah.pet provides link management, analytics, and an API in a self-hostable project. Its deployment and configuration options make it a fit for users prepared to operate their own service.

Visit Nah.pet

The facts

CurrentNah.pet
Free planNot publishedNot published
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestNot published
Plans published1None
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitecurrenturl.appgithub.com
On url shorteners#152 of 156#156 of 156

Current: what it does well

  • Free and open source.
  • Per-link analytics include geography and referrers.
  • Every shortened URL gets a QR code.
  • Supports four database options.
  • Docker Compose and Kubernetes deployment options are documented.

What to know first

  • OIDC single sign-on is license-gated.
  • Limited AGPL-3.0 license restricts commercial use.
  • Requires self-hosted deployment.

Nah.pet: what it does well

  • Free and MIT-licensed.
  • Supports custom domains and custom slugs.
  • Links can be password-protected or set to expire.
  • REST API includes bulk operations and data export.
  • Self-host with Docker Compose or manual installation.

What to know first

  • Self-hosting requires deployment work.
  • API authentication uses API keys.
  • Registration and public documentation depend on configuration.

Alternatives to Current Alternatives to Nah.pet The whole list