FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

CPU-X vs hw-probe

Both stand on system information software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CPU-X

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Choose CPU-X if you need a free, open source system information tool for GNU/Linux or FreeBSD and value its multiple interfaces. Look elsewhere if you need an actively maintained project or reliable detection of newer CPU generations.

Visit CPU-X

hw-probe

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

hw-probe combines hardware inventory, driver guidance, optional tests, and scheduled monitoring for Linux and BSD environments. Review its upload behavior and Snap limitations before choosing an installation method.

Visit hw-probe

The facts

CPU-Xhw-probe
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedLinux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On system information software#8 of 34#12 of 34

CPU-X: what it does well

  • Shows processor, motherboard, memory, system, graphics, and performance information.
  • Offers GTK, NCurses, and command-line interfaces.
  • Supports GNU/Linux and FreeBSD on x86 and ARM.
  • Free and open source under GPL-3.0.
  • Has package, AppImage, and Flathub distribution options.

What to know first

  • The project is archived and does not accept new issues.
  • The maintainer reported newer CPU generations were not properly detected.
  • The daemon requires root privileges for access to special devices.

hw-probe: what it does well

  • Provides permanent URLs for hardware snapshots.
  • Suggests kernel versions or third-party drivers for missing drivers.
  • Daily monitoring can email alerts about failures and changes.
  • Optional tests cover graphics, drives, CPU, and RAM.
  • Available in several package and deployment formats.

What to know first

  • Snap runs in a sandbox with limited functionality.
  • Drive SMART checks require disk block-device access.
  • Privacy masking may fail in edge cases.
  • No report export is listed.

Alternatives to CPU-X Alternatives to hw-probe The whole list