Side by side
Covidence vs MetaScreener
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial Web
Covidence covers the main stages of systematic review work with screening controls, extraction assistance, and exports. Review teams should check plan scope, import limits, and desktop requirements before purchase.
Visit Covidence Free plan Web
Visit MetaScreener The facts
| Covidence | MetaScreener | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Single: $339 a year | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | covidence.org | metascreener.net |
| On ai literature review software | #29 of 38 | #33 of 38 |
Covidence: what it does well
- Structured systematic-review workflow
- Blinded screening and conflict resolution
- Metadata and DOI extraction assistance
- Exports RIS, CSV, XLSX, and XML
- Institutional licensing available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Full-text screening requires desktop
- Imports over 15,000 references need batches
- Institutional pricing not listed
MetaScreener: what it does well
Alternatives to Covidence Alternatives to MetaScreener The whole list