Side by side
Covidence vs Litstream
Both stand on systematic review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial Web
Covidence covers the main stages of systematic review work with screening controls, extraction assistance, and exports. Review teams should check plan scope, import limits, and desktop requirements before purchase.
Visit Covidence Paid Web
Litstream brings review stages, assignments and reporting into a collaborative workflow. Teams can weigh its review-specific capabilities alongside pricing by request and the option of ICF support.
Visit LitstreamThe facts
| Covidence | Litstream | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Single: $339 a year | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | covidence.org | icf.com |
| On systematic review software | #26 of 30 | #30 of 30 |
Covidence: what it does well
- Structured systematic-review workflow
- Blinded screening and conflict resolution
- Metadata and DOI extraction assistance
- Exports RIS, CSV, XLSX, and XML
- Institutional licensing available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Full-text screening requires desktop
- Imports over 15,000 references need batches
- Institutional pricing not listed
Litstream: what it does well
- Workflow covers screening, extraction, assessment and visualization.
- Supports reference deduplication and protocols.
- Interactive bar charts and heat maps are built in.
- Worksheets support nested and logic-based fields.
- ICF offers training and end-to-end review assistance.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- The listed platform is web only.
- The tool suite is focused on systematic reviews.
Alternatives to Covidence Alternatives to Litstream The whole list