Side by side
CONDUIT vs Cylc
Both stand on workflow automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
CONDUIT offers broad connector coverage and workflow controls, from a free self-hosted plan to enterprise deployment options. Check hosting preferences and execution needs against the available plans.
Visit CONDUIT Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted
Cylc provides broad scheduling, dependency, distribution, and monitoring capabilities without a paid plan. Its system requirements and security configuration need attention when deploying it for multi-user or Jupyter-based work.
Visit CylcThe facts
| CONDUIT | Cylc | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 5 | 1 |
| Maker | CONDUIT | Not published |
| Website | clearglassinc.com | cylc.github.io |
| On workflow automation tools | #44 of 133 | #40 of 133 |
CONDUIT: what it does well
- 400 native connectors
- Supports multi-step workflows
- Includes conditional logic and webhook triggers
- Community plan has unlimited executions
- Enterprise supports air-gapped deployment
What to know first
- Community requires self-hosting
- Cloud execution allowance is 10,000 monthly
- Business execution allowance is 200,000 monthly
Cylc: what it does well
- Supports cycling and acyclic workflows
- Runs across network, HPC, and cloud systems
- Automatic recovery and workflow repetition
- Web, terminal, and command-line interfaces
- Multiple built-in job runners
What to know first
- Pip installation requires Python 3.12 or later
- Requires Bash, SSH, rsync, and GNU coreutils
- Jupyter deployments need suitable authorization policies