Conan vs Slackware pkgtools
| Conan | Slackware pkgtools | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | Conan recipes and binary packages | tgz, txz, tbz, tlz |
| Supported platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, embedded and bare-metal targets | Slackware Linux on x86, x86_64, and ARM ports |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | No |
| Lockfile support | Yes | — |
| Workspace support | Yes | — |
| Private registry auth | Yes | — |
| Offline installation | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Freedom251, Conan scores higher on our published basis.