Side by side
ClusterFuzz vs Fuzzinator
Both stand on fuzz testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2
ClusterFuzz covers crash discovery through fix verification, with automation for testcase handling and bug workflows. Its deployment dependencies and Monorail limitation are important to account for before adopting it.
Visit ClusterFuzz Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1
Fuzzinator automates fuzzing workflows, issue handling and scheduling, with configurable interfaces and optional tracker reporting. Users should account for its Python and MongoDB requirements and bring suitable generators for their targets.
Visit FuzzinatorThe facts
| ClusterFuzz | Fuzzinator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | google.github.io | fuzzinator.readthedocs.io |
| On fuzz testing software | #4 of 26 | #8 of 26 |
ClusterFuzz: what it does well
- Supports libFuzzer, AFL++, and Honggfuzz.
- Can minimize testcases and bisect regressions.
- Automates bug filing, triage, and closure.
- Free and Apache-2.0 licensed.
What to know first
- Production deployments depend on Google Cloud services.
- Local instances are supported only on Linux and macOS.
- Architecture currently supports Chromium-hosted Monorail only.
Fuzzinator: what it does well
- Schedules fuzz jobs across multiple targets and generators
- Can save issues and reduce failing test cases
- Offers Web UI and line-based dump mode
- Free, with no usage limits stated
What to know first
- Requires Python 3.10 or later and MongoDB 3.6 or later
- Framework includes only an example random generator
- Tracker reporting must be configured
Alternatives to ClusterFuzz Alternatives to Fuzzinator The whole list