Side by side
Circleback vs Millet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidAPIiPhone+3
Circleback offers several ways to capture meetings and turn them into searchable notes and actions. Review the free-plan limits and paid recording retention if you need a longer archive.
Visit Circleback Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit MilletThe facts
| Circleback | Millet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, API, iPhone, Mac, Web, Windows | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Pro: $15 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | circleback.ai | github.com |
| On ai meeting assistants | #17 of 82 | #55 of 82 |
Circleback: what it does well
- Transcribes in 110 languages
- Supports online and in-person meetings
- Offers bot, local recording, and file upload
- Automatically identifies speakers by name
- Free plan allows unlimited meetings
What to know first
- Free meeting and recording history lasts 30 days
- Free plan has limited automations
- Free plan supports two teams
- HIPAA compliance is included with Enterprise
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Alternatives to Circleback Alternatives to Millet The whole list