FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

CCFinderSW vs jscpd

Both stand on code clone detection tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

CCFinderSW

Free plan Windows

CCFinderSW provides configurable token-based clone detection with multiple output formats and command-line controls. Its language setup and Windows-only platform are important constraints to weigh.

Visit CCFinderSW

jscpd

Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2

jscpd combines repository-wide clone detection with build thresholds, reports, and developer workflow integrations. Its experimental semantic detection and language-specific dead-code limits are worth considering when choosing which checks to rely on.

Visit jscpd

The facts

CCFinderSWjscpd
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedYes
Runs onWindowsAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published12
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comjscpd.dev
On code clone detection tools#3 of 23#1 of 23

CCFinderSW: what it does well

  • Free and MIT-licensed.
  • Outputs clone data in four listed formats.
  • Supports UTF-8, Shift-JIS, EUC-JP and automatic recognition.
  • Clone threshold can be changed with -t.
  • Results can be read by Gemini or CCFX.

What to know first

  • Windows is the only listed platform.
  • Requires Java 8 or later.
  • A comment rule file is required for the target language.
  • Lexer is not optimized for individual languages.

jscpd: what it does well

  • Supports 224 languages, according to the project
  • Can enforce duplication thresholds in builds
  • Offers multiple report formats, including SARIF
  • Runs as a native binary without Node.js
  • Free and open source

What to know first

  • Semantic clone detection is experimental
  • Dead-code analysis covers only specified languages
  • Rust dead-code analysis needs compiler diagnostics

Alternatives to CCFinderSW Alternatives to jscpd The whole list