Side by side
candidate.fyi vs Role.so
Both stand on candidate experience software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
candidate.fyi brings scheduling, candidate updates, feedback collection, and recruiting integrations into one web platform. Its unlimited-user package and enterprise security features may fit larger talent teams, while request-based pricing requires a sales conversation.
Visit candidate.fyi Free trial Web
Role.so combines editable AI-assisted page creation with candidate response and engagement tracking. Plan choice matters for team seats, candidate-pack allowances, and features such as webhooks and white-label controls.
Visit Role.soThe facts
| candidate.fyi | Role.so | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Starter: $15 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | candidate.fyi | role.so |
| On candidate experience software | #6 of 33 | #10 of 33 |
candidate.fyi: what it does well
- Automates individual, panel, and loop scheduling
- Rebuilds schedules after conflicts
- Branded candidate portal and automated updates
- Integrates with over 40 ATS platforms
- Unlimited users and jobs
What to know first
- No free plan
- Pricing is available only on request
- Focused on web access
- Support response averages around 45 minutes
Role.so: what it does well
- AI drafts eight structured candidate page sections
- Drafts require user review and editing before publication
- Candidate interfaces support ten listed languages
- No hard visitor limits across tiers
What to know first
- No free plan
- Starter does not include webhooks
- Redirected candidate information is not saved on Role.so
Alternatives to candidate.fyi Alternatives to Role.so The whole list