FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

BrowserCat vs Browserless

Both stand on browser automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

BrowserCat

Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb

BrowserCat centralizes managed cloud browser execution behind one API and supports several common automation clients. Review credit charging and spending limits carefully when estimating usage.

Visit BrowserCat

Browserless

Free plan Open source Web

Browserless combines browser automation interfaces, APIs, and session persistence with both cloud and self-hosted deployment. Check the free plan's usage and session limits against your workload before choosing a paid tier.

Visit Browserless

The facts

BrowserCatBrowserless
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNoYes
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WebWeb
Lowest paid planBusiness: $50 a monthPrototyping: $25 a month
Plans published65
MakerBrowserCatBrowserless
Websitebrowsercat.combrowserless.io
On browser automation tools#7 of 62#3 of 62

BrowserCat: what it does well

  • Single endpoint for managed browsers
  • Automatic backend failover
  • Playwright, Puppeteer, and CDP support
  • Free Hobby plan
  • 1,000 concurrent requests

What to know first

  • No Selenium or Cypress support planned
  • Free plans have spending limits
  • Sessions currently run on Cloudflare
  • No self-hosted option

Browserless: what it does well

  • Connects with Puppeteer and Playwright over WebSocket.
  • REST APIs cover screenshots, PDFs, scraping, and extraction.
  • Offers persistent sessions and reconnects.
  • Supports cloud and self-hosted deployment.
  • Free plan includes 1,000 monthly units.

What to know first

  • Free sessions are limited to two minutes.
  • Free plan allows two concurrent browsers.
  • Paid plans start at $25 a month, billed annually.

Alternatives to BrowserCat Alternatives to Browserless The whole list