Side by side
Brakeman vs MobSF
Both stand on static application security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Brakeman focuses on security analysis for Rails code and offers multiple ways to install, report results, and automate scans. Its warnings need human judgment, and the faster mode trades some coverage for speed.
Visit Brakeman
Free plan AndroidAPIiPhone+3
MobSF offers static, dynamic and malware analysis with reporting and CI/CD integration. Check the Android version requirement for dynamic analysis and account for reduced depth with obfuscated or protected apps.
Visit MobSFThe facts
| Brakeman | MobSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | brakemanscanner.org | mobsf.org |
| On static application security testing software | #8 of 25 | #12 of 25 |
Brakeman: what it does well
- Targets Rails-specific vulnerability patterns
- Offers five report formats
- Supports command-line and Ruby library use
- Integrates with GitHub Actions and Jenkins
What to know first
- Requires Ruby 3.2.0 or later
- False positives can occur
- --faster may miss vulnerabilities
MobSF: what it does well
- Free Community Edition under GPL v3.
- Analyzes source code and binaries.
- Reports include remediation suggestions.
- Supports HTML, PDF and JSON reports.
- Can operate completely offline.
What to know first
- Dynamic analysis requires rooted Android.
- Dynamic analysis supports Android only through API 30.
- Obfuscation can limit analysis depth.
- Free support is limited to its Slack channel.
Alternatives to Brakeman Alternatives to MobSF The whole list