FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Brakeman vs DeepSource

Both stand on ruby static analysis tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Brakeman

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Brakeman focuses on security analysis for Rails code and offers multiple ways to install, report results, and automate scans. Its warnings need human judgment, and the faster mode trades some coverage for speed.

Visit Brakeman

DeepSource

Free plan APILinuxMac+3

DeepSource combines pull request review with security scans and code-coverage thresholds. Compare the free tier’s monthly allowances with your review volume, and note the annual billing on Team.

Visit DeepSource

The facts

BrakemanDeepSource
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNo
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestTeam: $30 a month
Plans published17
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitebrakemanscanner.orgdeepsource.com
On ruby static analysis tools#2 of 21#1 of 21

Brakeman: what it does well

  • Targets Rails-specific vulnerability patterns
  • Offers five report formats
  • Supports command-line and Ruby library use
  • Integrates with GitHub Actions and Jenkins

What to know first

  • Requires Ruby 3.2.0 or later
  • False positives can occur
  • --faster may miss vulnerabilities

DeepSource: what it does well

  • Reviews use over 5,000 deterministic rules and an AI agent.
  • Autofix offers verified, pre-generated patches for many issues.
  • Free tier includes unlimited public repositories and members.
  • Enterprise offers self-hosted and airgapped deployment.

What to know first

  • Free-tier pull request reviews are limited to 1,000 monthly.
  • Free-tier formatting runs are limited to 1,000 monthly.
  • GraphQL API limit is 5,000 requests per hour per user.
  • Enterprise pricing is custom.

Alternatives to Brakeman Alternatives to DeepSource The whole list