Side by side
Basemark Web 3.0 vs Bonnie++
Both stand on pc benchmark software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Basemark Web 3.0 offers broad browser workload coverage and online result comparison, with automation options for repeatable runs. Check the license terms if you need the benchmark for commercial use.
Visit Basemark Web 3.0 Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Bonnie++ covers both bulk I/O and small-file activity, with CSV and plain-text output for reviewing results. Its production warning makes a separate test environment important.
Visit Bonnie++The facts
| Basemark Web 3.0 | Bonnie++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 3 | 1 |
| Maker | Basemark Web 3.0 | Not published |
| Website | web.gpuscore.com | github.com |
| On pc benchmark software | #16 of 73 | #12 of 73 |
Basemark Web 3.0: what it does well
- Covers JavaScript, WebGL, DOM, CSS and battery testing.
- Results can be compared in the online Powerboard.
- Community Mode supports URL-driven automated runs.
- Custom test profiles and automation are available.
What to know first
- Free, Pro and Community use is non-commercial only.
- For reliable scores, other browsers and tabs should be closed.
Bonnie++: what it does well
- Tests sequential I/O, rewrites, and random seeks
- Includes small-file creation, stat, and deletion tests
- Can test over 2 GB on 32-bit machines
- Exports plain text and CSV results
- Free under GPL version 2.0
What to know first
- Documentation advises against running it on production machines
- Consumes disk space or inodes during runs
- Linux command-line software
Alternatives to Basemark Web 3.0 Alternatives to Bonnie++ The whole list