Side by side

Azurite vs LocalStack

Both stand on service virtualization software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Azurite

Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+2

Azurite offers a local Azure Storage-compatible environment with broad installation choices and useful Blob and Queue coverage. Check its documented gaps and preview status before relying on it for unsupported features.

Visit Azurite

LocalStack

Free plan Open source APIExtensionLinux+4

LocalStack provides local cloud emulation for development and testing, with CI integrations and paid preview allowances. Check the Hobby plan’s non-commercial restriction and the stated production scope before selecting a plan.

Visit LocalStack

The facts

	Azurite	LocalStack
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Yes
Runs on	Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows	API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	See the plans
Plans published	1	14
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	github.com	localstack.cloud
On service virtualization software	#2 of 21	#1 of 21

Azurite: what it does well

Free and open source under the MIT License.
Supports Blob and Queue storage operations.
Works with Azure SDKs, CLI, and Storage Explorer.
Offers several installation routes.

What to know first

Table storage is marked as preview.
Telemetry collection is enabled by default.
Some Blob features are unsupported or limited.
Table OAuth is unsupported.

LocalStack: what it does well

Emulates AWS with 120+ services and Snowflake.
Can run in four named CI systems.
Lists CDK, Terraform, and Pulumi support.
Paid AWS plans include workspace preview allowances.

What to know first

Hobby terms prohibit commercial software development use.
LocalStack is not for production customer-facing applications.
Azure is described as a public preview coming soon.

Alternatives to Azurite Alternatives to LocalStack The whole list