Side by side
Awardmatic vs Picter
Both stand on contest software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
Choose Awardmatic if you need a web-based workflow for submissions, fee collection, judging, and publishing results, with controls such as blind review and role-based access. Look elsewhere if you need a free option or a platform beyond the web.
Visit Awardmatic Paid Web
Visit Picter The facts
| Awardmatic | Picter | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Organization: $1,495 a year | Not published |
| Plans published | 2 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | awardmatic.com | picter.com |
| On contest software | #16 of 20 | #20 of 20 |
Awardmatic: what it does well
- Supports blind review, conflict handling, and judging rounds.
- Entry forms include drafts and large-file uploads.
- Role-based permissions tailor access for each participant type.
- Automated messages cover deadlines, status, and winner updates.
- Results can be exported with decision records retained.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- The listed starting price is $1,495 per year.
- It is available on the web platform.
- Service parts may be suspended temporarily for maintenance, security, or legal reasons.
Picter: what it does well
Alternatives to Awardmatic Alternatives to Picter The whole list