Side by side
Avoma vs Millet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial AndroidAPIExtension+3
Avoma combines meeting capture, transcription, summaries, and action items, with a free view-only option for meeting records. Check the annual billing terms and seat limits when comparing its paid plans.
Visit Avoma Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit MilletThe facts
| Avoma | Millet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | No | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, API, Extension, iPhone, Mac, Web | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Startup: $19 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 10 | None |
| Maker | Avoma | Not published |
| Website | avoma.com | github.com |
| On ai meeting assistants | #62 of 82 | #55 of 82 |
Avoma: what it does well
- Captures meetings across five named platforms
- Transcription supports 62 languages
- Provides summaries and action items
- Unlimited free view-only seats on two paid plans
What to know first
- Paid plans are billed annually
- Enterprise requires at least 10 paid seats
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token