FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Avoma vs ghostmeet

Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Avoma

Free trial AndroidAPIExtension+3

Avoma combines meeting capture, transcription, summaries, and action items, with a free view-only option for meeting records. Check the annual billing terms and seat limits when comparing its paid plans.

Visit Avoma

ghostmeet

Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1

ghostmeet combines local browser audio transcription with optional Claude-based meeting summaries. Its self-hosted, account-free design gives users control, while summary generation depends on an external API.

Visit ghostmeet

The facts

Avomaghostmeet
Free planA free trialYes
Open sourceNoNot published
Runs onAndroid, API, Extension, iPhone, Mac, WebAPI, Extension, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planStartup: $19 a monthFree or on request
Plans published101
MakerAvomaNot published
Websiteavoma.comghostmeet.sshlab.dev
On ai meeting assistants#62 of 82#41 of 82

Avoma: what it does well

  • Captures meetings across five named platforms
  • Transcription supports 62 languages
  • Provides summaries and action items
  • Unlimited free view-only seats on two paid plans

What to know first

  • Paid plans are billed annually
  • Enterprise requires at least 10 paid seats

ghostmeet: what it does well

  • Whisper transcription works offline
  • Captures audio from several browser meeting platforms
  • Summaries include decisions and action items
  • Transcripts persist through backend restarts
  • Open source under the MIT license

What to know first

  • Native Zoom and Teams desktop apps are unsupported
  • Summaries require an Anthropic API key
  • Summarization needs an internet connection
  • Speaker diarization is still a roadmap feature

Alternatives to Avoma Alternatives to ghostmeet The whole list