FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

autopep8 vs Fourmolu

Both stand on code formatting tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

autopep8

Free plan APILinuxMac+1

autopep8 offers configurable PEP 8 formatting across major desktop platforms and can be used from commands, hooks, or Python code. Review aggressive changes carefully because some can affect meaning.

Visit autopep8

Fourmolu

Free plan LinuxWebWindows

Fourmolu offers configurable Haskell formatting, with browser, editor, and CI integration options. Its experimental CPP support and LF-only output are important constraints to consider.

Visit Fourmolu

The facts

autopep8Fourmolu
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedFree or on request
Plans publishedNone1
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comfourmolu.github.io
On code formatting tools#8 of 34#12 of 34

autopep8: what it does well

  • Free and MIT licensed
  • Fixes most pycodestyle-reported issues
  • Supports configurable fix codes
  • Works as a pre-commit hook
  • Provides a Python module API

What to know first

  • Requires Python 3.9 or newer
  • Requires the pycodestyle dependency
  • Aggressive fixes may change code meaning
  • No editor integration listed

Fourmolu: what it does well

  • Offers an interactive browser demo.
  • Formatting options can be configured in YAML or CLI.
  • Can use Cabal defaults and dependencies for fixities.
  • Supports selective formatting with comments or line regions.
  • Editor integration through Haskell Language Server is documented.

What to know first

  • CPP handling is experimental and limited to simple cases.
  • Always outputs LF line endings.
  • Check mode can fail on CRLF files.

Alternatives to autopep8 Alternatives to Fourmolu The whole list