Side by side

Autodesk Netfabb vs Kiri:Moto

Both stand on computer-aided manufacturing (cam) software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Autodesk Netfabb

Free plan LinuxWindows

Netfabb covers model preparation through advanced additive manufacturing optimization in tiered plans. Its Windows-only availability and lack of cloud slicing may affect deployment choices.

Visit Autodesk Netfabb

Kiri:Moto offers several fabrication workflows in a free browser-based slicer, with desktop, Docker, and command-line options also documented. Users with unsupported printers may need to adjust a similar device or import an INI file, and macro logic will not convert automatically.

Visit Kiri:Moto

The facts

	Autodesk Netfabb	Kiri:Moto
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Linux, Windows	API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Free or on request
Plans published	5	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	autodesk.com	grid.space
On computer-aided manufacturing (cam) software	#2 of 16	#1 of 16

Autodesk Netfabb: what it does well

Prepares and modifies additive-manufacturing models
Provides automatic supports and model repair
Includes printer control and multi-material tools
Premium adds automatic 3D packing
Ultimate offers Lua scripting automation

What to know first

Cloud slicing is not supported
Only Windows is listed

Kiri:Moto: what it does well

Free web app access without ads.
Supports CAM, FDM, SLA, and LASER modes.
Imports OBJ, STL, and 3MF files.
Maker says user data is not sent to or stored in the cloud.
OctoPrint plugin can spool jobs over a local network.

What to know first

Other modes extending LASER are not first-class modes.
Unsupported printer macro logic does not convert automatically.
Cloud slicing is not available.

Alternatives to Autodesk Netfabb Alternatives to Kiri:Moto The whole list