Side by side
AutoCaption vs Whisparr
Both stand on ai video caption generators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIWeb
AutoCaption combines multilingual transcription, detailed caption styling and direct social publishing. Its free tier supports trying the workflow, while paid plans add capacity and collaboration features.
Visit AutoCaption Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted
Whisparr provides command-line subtitle transcription and translation with flexible model, format, and processing choices. It is a practical fit for self-hosted workflows, while several convenience features remain planned.
Visit WhisparrThe facts
| AutoCaption | Whisparr | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Web | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter: $18 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | AutoCaption | Not published |
| Website | autocaption.io | github.com |
| On ai video caption generators | #47 of 99 | #51 of 99 |
AutoCaption: what it does well
- Supports over 100 languages
- Edits caption words and timing
- Includes branded caption presets
- Publishes to major short-video platforms
- Offers a free tier without credit card
What to know first
- Starter limits videos to two minutes
- Starter allows 500 MB uploads
- Accounts are for individual users
Whisparr: what it does well
- Free and MIT licensed
- Selectable Whisper model sizes
- SRT and WebVTT subtitle output
- Recursive batch directory processing
- CPU operation with optional CUDA acceleration
What to know first
- Translation requires an OpenAI or Anthropic API key
- Installation requires Python 3.8 or newer and FFmpeg
- No web interface is currently listed
- Docker deployment is a future enhancement
Alternatives to AutoCaption Alternatives to Whisparr The whole list