Side by side

AuroraBoot vs Confluent

Both stand on bare metal provisioning software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

AuroraBoot

Free plan APILinuxMac+3

AuroraBoot combines image building, provisioning, and fleet management for self-hosted deployments. Its unauthenticated plain-HTTP netboot server is an important security limitation to consider.

Visit AuroraBoot

Confluent

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Confluent covers server provisioning, hardware operations, and cluster management through several interfaces. Check the documented management-server OS and firewall requirements before deployment.

Visit Confluent

The facts

	AuroraBoot	Confluent
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows	API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Not published
Plans published	1	None
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	github.com	xcat2.github.io
On bare metal provisioning software	#3 of 28	#7 of 28

AuroraBoot: what it does well

Builds several image types from Kairos flavors or containers.
Provisions through PXE/netboot, Redfish, or USB.
Provides a browser dashboard for fleet operations.
Includes a REST API and Go client.
Free under Apache License 2.0.

What to know first

Requires Docker or a container engine.
Netboot HTTP server is unauthenticated.
Netboot files are served over plain HTTP.

Confluent: what it does well

Supports clusters from a handful of nodes to many thousands.
Deploys stateful and stateless images using several boot methods.
Provides hardware management through IPMI, Redfish, and plugins.
Offers command-line, Python, web, and REST interfaces.
Free under the Apache 2.0 license.

What to know first

Installation requires a listed supported management-server OS.
Firewall settings may need adjustment.
xCAT-exclusive features may require running both projects.

Alternatives to AuroraBoot Alternatives to Confluent The whole list