Side by side
Argilla vs Datasaur
Both stand on data labeling software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Argilla brings dataset annotation, feedback collection and collaboration into one tool, with deployment and portability options for teams. Plan a separate model-training workflow, and avoid ephemeral Space storage for data that must persist.
Visit Argilla
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Datasaur combines data labeling, LLM evaluation, integrations, and self-hosting options. Compare the plan limits and OAuth availability with your needs, and note that the Free plan has limited users and storage.
Visit DatasaurThe facts
| Argilla | Datasaur | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Growth: $24 a year |
| Plans published | 1 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | argilla.io | datasaur.ai |
| On data labeling software | #5 of 24 | #9 of 24 |
Argilla: what it does well
- Free, open-source plan
- Supports labels, ratings, rankings and text responses
- Integrates with Hugging Face and spaCy
- Offers a Python SDK and REST API
- Exports and imports datasets across several destinations
What to know first
- Does not train models
- Hugging Face Spaces ephemeral data is lost on restart
Datasaur: what it does well
- Supports multiple text, document, image, and audio labeling types.
- LLM Labs includes human and automated evaluation.
- Self-hosting is available through Kubernetes or Docker.
- Free plan includes one user and 5,000 labels per year.
What to know first
- OAuth credentials are limited to Growth and Enterprise.
- Free plan is limited to one user and 100MB storage.
- Starter costs $5,000 a year.
Alternatives to Argilla Alternatives to Datasaur The whole list