Side by side
ArchiveWeb.page vs dotts
Both stand on web annotation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+1
ArchiveWeb.page provides local, interactive web capture with replay and standard archive exports. Its browser requirements and optional IPFS sharing model are important to understand before use.
Visit ArchiveWeb.page Free plan Web
dotts focuses on collecting and managing visual feedback through guest-access review links. Consider the project limit and branding restrictions when choosing between its free and Pro plans.
Visit dottsThe facts
| ArchiveWeb.page | dotts | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Linux, Mac, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Pro: $15 a month |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | archiveweb.page | dotts.se |
| On web annotation tools | #4 of 31 | #8 of 31 |
ArchiveWeb.page: what it does well
- Free browser extension and desktop app
- Captures interactive webpages while browsing
- Exports WARC and WACZ collections
- Stores archives locally in IndexedDB
- Keeps archives private by default
What to know first
- Requires Chrome or a Chromium-based browser
- Autopilot behavior is not guaranteed
- IPFS sharing may expose archives
- Sharing requires browser and extension to stay open
dotts: what it does well
- Clients can comment without an account or installation
- Supports images, PDFs, and live website URLs
- Comment context includes device, browser, and screen size
- Free plan allows up to three projects and unlimited reviewers
What to know first
- Free plan is limited to three projects
- Review links use a dotts domain
- Custom domains and logo swaps are not offered
Alternatives to ArchiveWeb.page Alternatives to dotts The whole list