FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Ahrefs vs Medama Analytics

Both stand on web analytics tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Ahrefs

Free plan APIWeb

Ahrefs covers core SEO research and auditing alongside APIs and content tools. Compare project, tracked-keyword, crawl-credit, and user allowances against the intended plan; no trial or refund policy is stated in the supplied information.

Visit Ahrefs

Medama Analytics

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

Medama Analytics offers privacy-focused, self-hosted measurement with live data, event tracking, and an API. Its platform support and early version status should be considered before deployment.

Visit Medama Analytics

The facts

AhrefsMedama Analytics
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, WebAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planStarter: $29 a monthNot published
Plans published10None
MakerAhrefsNot published
Websiteahrefs.commedama.io
On web analytics tools#77 of 142#81 of 142

Ahrefs: what it does well

  • Covers keyword, competitor, backlink, and rank research.
  • Free plan includes site data and fixes.
  • Content Explorer finds web mentions and link prospects.
  • Annual payment saves up to 17%.
  • Enterprise includes access management and audit logs.

What to know first

  • Free plan limits Site Explorer and Site Audit access.
  • Lite includes one user; additional users cost extra.
  • Enterprise requires an annual commitment.

Medama Analytics: what it does well

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Tracking script under 1KB
  • Real-time analytics and custom events
  • No cookies or IP tracking
  • Single-binary and Docker deployment

What to know first

  • Windows binary is unsupported
  • Country estimates cannot show exact regions
  • Version 0.x may introduce breaking changes
  • Storage needs grow with traffic

Alternatives to Ahrefs Alternatives to Medama Analytics The whole list