FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Agola vs GitHub Actions

Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Agola

Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Agola provides a broad self-hosted workflow system with Git triggers, container runs, advanced workflow patterns, and flexible execution environments. Teams must operate the service themselves and currently rely on local secrets.

Visit Agola

GitHub Actions

Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1

GitHub Actions offers workflow automation with both runner options and plan-specific minute and storage allowances. Compare those limits and the first-12-month paid pricing before selecting a tier.

Visit GitHub Actions

The facts

AgolaGitHub Actions
Free planNot publishedYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebLinux, Mac, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedTeam: $4 per user a month
Plans publishedNone3
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteagola.iogithub.com
On continuous integration software#48 of 58#44 of 58

Agola: what it does well

  • Open-source Apache 2.0 license
  • Kubernetes or local Docker execution
  • GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea sources
  • Fan-in, fan-out, multi-architecture workflows
  • Artifact or dependency cache

What to know first

  • No hosted option
  • Remote secret managers are planned
  • Completed-task restart is not available yet
  • Internal APIs should not be externally exposed

GitHub Actions: what it does well

  • Supports hosted options and self-hosted runners.
  • Pull request checks are supported.
  • Artifact or dependency caching is supported.
  • Free plan includes 2,000 CI/CD minutes monthly.

What to know first

  • Free plan includes 500 MB of Packages storage.
  • Team and Enterprise prices shown apply only to first 12 months.
  • Paid tiers are priced per user.

Alternatives to Agola Alternatives to GitHub Actions The whole list