Side by side
Agola vs Bamboo
Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Agola provides a broad self-hosted workflow system with Git triggers, container runs, advanced workflow patterns, and flexible execution environments. Teams must operate the service themselves and currently rely on local secrets.
Visit Agola
Paid LinuxMacWeb+1
Bamboo offers plan choices with different job and agent allowances, plus self-hosted runners and pull request checks. The lack of hosted operation and on-request pricing are important considerations.
Visit BambooThe facts
| Agola | Bamboo | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | agola.io | atlassian.com |
| On continuous integration software | #48 of 58 | #52 of 58 |
Agola: what it does well
- Open-source Apache 2.0 license
- Kubernetes or local Docker execution
- GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea sources
- Fan-in, fan-out, multi-architecture workflows
- Artifact or dependency cache
What to know first
- No hosted option
- Remote secret managers are planned
- Completed-task restart is not available yet
- Internal APIs should not be externally exposed
Bamboo: what it does well
- Growing teams includes unlimited jobs and local agents.
- Data Center includes unlimited jobs.
- Supports pull request checks.
- Artifact or dependency caching is available.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Prices are available on request.
- Hosted operation is not offered.
- Small teams has no remote agents.