Aerospike Database vs Hibari
| Aerospike Database | Hibari | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Maximum value size | 8 MB | — |
| Persistence modes | both | both |
| TTL support | Yes | Yes |
| Clustering support | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-region support | Yes | — |
| Supported protocols | Aerospike wire protocol, Aerospike client API, TCP | UBF, EBF, JSON over TCP (JSF), HTTP (JSON-RPC), Thrift |
Both are listed in Best Key-Value Databases. On Freedom251, Aerospike Database scores higher on our published basis.